BLOG

Posts tagged US Congress
Smith Shares Stance on Term Limits

Smith Shares Stance on Term Limits

Candidates for office are quick to voice their support for term limits without offering broader discussion or perspective on what it really means or how it would function in practice.  I would also remind people that in recent history many candidates and the elected proclaimed they would among other things, “Stop Common Core," or “Repeal and Replace the ACA," or “Limit the influence of big money in politics”.  These and so many other pledges share the distinction of having gone unfulfilled.  Words are easy.

In regard to the Term Limits pledge, examine what it says.  The pledge reads as follows: “I, __________, pledge that as a member of Congress I will cosponsor and vote for the U.S. Term Limits Amendment of three (3) House terms and two (2) Senate terms and no longer limit.”  

If you have paid any attention to congress over the years one thing that is glaringly apparent is that they vote on all kinds of things, over and over again, more often than not to no actual consequence.  Show votes or votes of political theater are the norm, not the exception.  Therefore, to pledge to “co-sponsor and vote for” an amendment is largely inconsequential.  Granted, making the pledge is in the scheme of things better than not making it, but recognize it for what it is.  The substantive pledge would be to impose a term limit upon oneself regardless of whether Congress and those who embody it ever develop the will to legislate such.  I don’t recommend holding your breath while waiting for such a bill to become law.  

I have proposed term-limits since I first declared my candidacy in the 2104 race and further pledged to never work as a lobbyist.  Not only have I said such things, but I have previously acted in accord with them.  While serving on the City Council in Middletown, I opposed the removal of voter implemented term limits by the Council (1).  It is instructive to note that the ability of the council to remove the term-limits by mere council vote was a by-product of then NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s shenanigans in pursuit of a 3rd term (2).  It is a rare thing that politicians will limit themselves; it is more commonly the opposite.

Another, and perhaps more important consideration, is the notion that limiting the “professional politicians” to a certain number of terms will necessarily have a large impact on governance.  Perhaps many people are not familiar with the inner workings of the electoral process, particularly in terms of ballot access and candidate selection, or the degree to which it is monopolized by the two Major political parties.  Already in NY efforts are underway to further inhibit access to the ballot and to thwart electoral competition.  To get straight to the point, the candidates for office are selected by the party infrastructure.  Removing candidates by way of term limits will not change the fact that their replacements will then be selected by the same party infrastructure.  It is highly optimistic to believe that the resulting “new” candidates will not be selected to serve and advance the parties interests just as the “old” candidate had done.  Again, term limits should be implemented; however, people must temper their expectations as to their efficacy.  

Although candidate Farley states “Term limits will make members of Congress accountable to the people they represent, instead of to Washington insiders,” she must recognize that it will take much more than that including broader honest competition.  Similarly, Congressman Maloney speaks often of the competitive nature of the 18th District and how he welcomes open competition.  In addition, he has on more than one occasion stated that he believes there should be more policemen, firefighters, and teachers running for congress.  However, when he had the opportunity to act on those proclamations his deeds fell far from his words. 

In light of all of this I make the following challenge to Ms. Farley and Mr. Maloney: Make and stand by the pledge that I have made.  Pledge to adhere to a self-imposed term-limit AND to never work as a lobbyist following your service.  In addition, endeavor to have your actions align with your words.

(1) https://www.middletown-ny.com/en/doc-center/agendas-minutes/common-council/2010-common-council-agendas-minutes/102-sep-27-2010-cc-minutes/file.html

(2) https://www.recordonline.com/article/20100828/NEWS/8280326

Top 10 List

The Top 10 Reasons I Am Your Candidate

 

TAXES

If you believe that the tax code is meant to be a tool to be used to reward and persuade those who you favor or to punish and silence those you oppose, then you already have the Republican and Democrat Party Candidates to choose from.

If instead you believe that the tax code should exist for the sole purpose of raising the funds necessary to fulfill the essential, and limited, responsibilities of the Federal Government as defined by the Constitution, then I am your candidate.

 

QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT

If you believe it is acceptable to be governed by scoundrels, so long as they are “your” scoundrels, then you already have the Democrat and Republican Party Candidates to choose from.

If however, you believe that those who we empower to govern should not need a committee to tell them right from wrong, and that they should promote and exemplify our best qualities, then I am your candidate.

 

IMMIGRATION

If you believe that America's immigration policy exists to be milked for political purposes for decades, then you already have the Republican and Democrat Party Candidates to choose from.

If you believe that our current immigration policies are an existential threat to our Country and must be addressed in a straight-forward, honest, unapologetic manner, then I am your candidate.

 

JUSTICE SYSTEM

If you believe the Criminal Justice System and the rule of law are merely a field upon which to play a game of emotion and half-truths, then you already have the Democrat and Republican Party Candidates to choose from.

If, on the other hand, you believe that they are in fact part of the very bedrock of our civil society and that they should embody the protections guaranteed to all of us by the Constitution, then I am your candidate.

 

THE CONSTITUTION

If you desire a candidate who champions the 10th Amendment when it suits them and ignores it when it hinders them; or who supports or opposes the 2nd Amendment based on who they are speaking to; or who generally treats the Constitution and its Amendments as garments to be adorned and shed at will, then you already have the Republican and Democrat Party Candidates to choose from.

If instead you desire a candidate who respects these foundational principles irrespective of the circumstances of the moment, then I am your candidate.

 

HYPOCRISY

If you believe that hypocrisy is a virtue both in principle and in practice, then you already have the Democrat and Republican Party Candidates to choose from.

If you prefer, just as I do, a candidate that is genuine in word and deed, then I am your candidate.

 

FOCUSED EFFORT

If you seek a candidate that will devote 40-50% of their time to raising funds for their party, who will blindly run with whatever their party hands them, and will then give their remaining time to represent you, then you already have the Republican and Democrat Party Candidates to choose from.

If you would rather have a candidate that commits 100% of their time and effort to representing you and to studying the issues at hand with no distraction or confliciting interests, then I am your candidate.

 

RADICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS

If you desire a candidate who believes that they and their party alone are the sole source of good ideas and virtue and that anyone who disagrees with them is evil, unintelligent, or both; a candidate who will discard the rules to achieve their "virtuous" ends or to hinder their opponents "evil" designs, then you already have the Democrat and Republican Party Candidates to choose from.

If you instead want a candidate who will value the merits of an idea over its source, who will work with anyone who has shown themselves to be of good faith to seek solutions to the many problems we face, then I am your candidate.

 

REALITY

If you prefer a candidate who believes that simply by speaking that the words they utter create reality, then you already have the Republican and Democrat Party Candidates to choose from.

If you seek a candidate that speaks about reality and has no illusions that their words alone make anything so, then I am your candidate.

 

TIME

If you want a candidate who seeks only short-term solutions to long-term problems because their eyes are always on their next election cycle timeframe, then you already have the Democrat and Republican Party Candidates to choose from.

If you want a candidate willing to take a longer view and work diligently towards meaningful solutions, then I am your candidate.